I know the feeling. I am always going to be called mafia due to people judging me on how I post, no matter what.
Good game though, MCH.
That means you’re doing it wrong
This happens less when your play style is more clear to everyone.
EX: I used to have people always on me for my aggressive playstyle and nearly got lynched so many times as town. Now its an established playstyle of mine and people look for other ways to catch me as scum.
……And I thought your reasoning on MCH was bad. This is past day one and RNG is unnecessary.Didn't I answer them? I mean alot of people have voted with crappier reasons. You're acting town, but aren't giving us much to work with.
As for crackfox's vote on me I find out odd. If we were to go by what this game has gone, then my reason for voting would make sense. I think @CrackFox; just wanted an out, for not voting anyone else.
Voting someone for ambiguity is better than some of the other reasoning?And why do you think she wanted that?
He also didn't reply when I told him that RNG was the reason why he was getting voted.
Vote: Jack
I wouldn’t either because that reasoning at this point is that bad. I don't think you understand what kind of mean it would of been, I guess I'll respond to it now...1) there's no way you had time to do an RNG from my post to yours.
2) people won't go onto lynching me for an RNG
3) If RNG is still your method to lynch then there's nothing to say to you, since RNG will tell you what to do
4) You haven't said anything else but persecute ROMCH, for valid reasons, and then you switch to me because RNG?????????
Also are you saying it's not weird to put a vote on someone, they give you enough evidence to not vote for them, but then you vote for them anyways? I don't think I've ever seen that. (then again my repertoire is 5 games)
1) It takes nor more than a few seconds with good internet. So she actually could have.2) True. Well unless they’re desperate.
3) N/A
4) What makes RNG any less valid than AE’s other reasoning.
You can learn a lot in a just a few games. 4 minutes is enough time to visit random.org and get a random number... especially since Life has assigned players numbers since day one
I never said it wasn't weird. I just said the evidence wasn't really enough to persuade me not to vote for MCH...
and are you telling me there hasn't been weirder reasons during this game?
You’re basically the only one giving such strange reasoning. And there was plenty of reason not to vote for MCH at the time. The only reason he got lynched is because he overreacted and began contradicting himself. You also contradict yourself. 37-41 is 4.Maybe it was partly retaliatory. I won't deny that.
Why not? Unless you have a firm read on who your team is, weird reasons will have to do.
What’s with the math?What was part retaliatory? And why shouldn’t we lynch you for OMGUS then?
No not true. I had some pretty good reasoning against you, and MCH. So yeah not weird reasoning. 56-53=3 but I posted in the later half of the minute.
Also there has to be some kind of read on people, I mean if you still don't have reads I'm kind of wondering what your criteria on reads are.
What’s with the math?Me too. I want to know what they’re looking for.
I have reads. I'm not sharing them with you, but I do have reads.
……That benefits no one. You should share your reads with the thread so we can work to figure out what player to kill next.Then why not use those instead of a tool that can harm you if your target is town?
Also I want to address the question that no ine has asked,
Why do you guys think there was a no kill? Was the killer mafia one of the inactives? Was there a block?
My guess is another doctor or like Zexy said commuter or something like that. Any role that includes no death. *narrows eyes at Jack* Because I can?*shrug* So far I haven't had any problems with this method.
……………If we are ever mafia together then I’m bussing you if you rely on RNG. Well that would be assuming ambiguity would be what I would focus on if there was a no lynch. We can't say I would focus on ambiguity just because I am now. Maybe ambiguity would be considered good by me if there was no lynch?The first lynch lead to people not wanting to disclose information on the grounds it could kill them.
Also I think going after someone else would be more efficient, maybe have the subs explain what they think? Personally I would of gone for emolga this turn, since he seems to be leaning towards mafia, and has said incriminating stuff. (Who came in for him?)
Um….The first lynched did claim. We just didn’t believe him. Also what’s wrong with ambiguity when sides aren’t as clear cut in this game.Can you show us this incriminating stuff? And what does incriminating mean?
I have a feeling there's a Town lynch redirector to prevent this kind of thing, and that you'll die, but we'll see.
Can't say I'm surprised, although I suspected jokool.
UNVOTE: Sword Master
VOTE: Sword Master
Tbh everyone should be voting Sword Master.
Why should we all vote for them? unvote: jackatlasredvote: swordmaster
Eh, Sure. Why not. Jack is off the hook for today.
…..You act like you had solid reasoning for voting him.
VOTE: Swordmaster
Because jumping on bandwagons is fun~
ncG1vNJzZmiapaGvorPAq5uepl6jsrV706GpnpmUqHywusRmp6Kdk5p6orjAm5isrJFiuqKyyJpknqaUnK6usYybmKunoaqybsPOq6KsZaeeu29%2Bj2ppam1fpa6osYxrag%3D%3D